INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
International
Reactions Fail to Stop Killings and Disappearances
(First of three parts)
A couple in Pantabangan, Nueva Ecija took
their own lives in October 2006 because they could not bear anymore days
of torture by government soldiers. The couple’s suicide shows the level by
which alleged military atrocities have reached and the sheer helplessness
of reported targets of political persecution.
BY DABET CASTAÑEDA AND
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO
Bulatlat
CAMP-IN Scout Rangers
camp in at Brgy. Balaong, San Miguel, Bulaca BULATLAT FILE PHOTO |
Early morning
of Oct. 11, 2006, Librado and Martina Gallardo gathered five of their
children, who were in the house at that time in Barangay Conversion,
Pantabangan, Nueva Ecija. Their farewell words were portentous: “Alagaan
n’yo ang mga kapatid n’yo” (Take care of your younger siblings). All
were in tears.
Two hours
later, the couple was found sprawled on the ground, barely breathing. The
children frantically called their brother Rico, who was on his way to the
forest to haul charcoal, and told him their parents were dying after
taking pesticide. Theirs being a remote village, it took them two hours to
find a tricycle that would bring them to the hospital – more than an hour
away. Librado and Martina died before reaching the hospital.
|
Two days
before, the couple had been held and accused by soldiers of being
supporters of the New People’s Army (NPA). Martina and Librado – a lay
leader of the United Methodist Church in Conversion – were tortured for
the succeeding couple of days.
On Oct. 10,
the soldiers told Librado, already bruised and beaten, that he would be
killed the following day if he did not surrender an M-16 rifle and P40,000
– which his relatives say he knew nothing about. His whole family would be
killed as well, he was further told.
Choice between two ways
For Librado
and Martina, it was a choice between two ways to die. If they showed
nothing to what the soldiers were asking, they would be shot. They took
their own lives.
The suicide
of the Gallardo couple shows the extent by which the human rights
situation in the Philippines has deteriorated. Mounting cases of
extra-judicial killings and forced abductions have established a reign of
fear particularly among villages suspected by the military of coddling
communist guerrillas. Fear is what counter-insurgency doctrines are
supposed to instill in order to deprive suspected “enemies of the state”
of their mass support.
The
politically-motivated killings in the Philippines have become
internationalized somewhat, drawing expressions of concern and
denunciations from reputable rights watchdogs, major church organizations,
lawyers’ groups and even a few foreign governments and multinational
business groups. At least two governments, those of Finland and Japan,
have warned that economic aid to the Philippine government would
henceforth be contingent on its human rights record.
Despite the
international reactions, the Arroyo administration and its military could
not be expected to admit to the killings if indeed they are found to be
the perpetrators. Instead, they have blamed the armed Left for the
incidents who, government spokespersons claim, would then attribute these
to the government to discredit its leadership. Mrs. Macapagal-Arroyo has
promised to investigate the cases but so far, none of the families of the
victims or organizations that have taken up their cause is cooperating,
preferring instead to bring the issue to international justice – such as
the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva and the
prestigious Permanent Peoples Tribunal (PPT) in The Hague.
A similar
complaint has also been filed by the labor center, Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU)
with the International Labor Organization (ILO), also in Geneva, on behalf
of trade union activists and leaders who have also been summarily
executed.
Human rights report
Releasing its
2006 Human Rights Report last Dec. 1 in a news conference in Quezon City,
Karapatan (Alliance for the Advancement of People’s Rights) stated that
2006 is “the worst year for human rights” since the Marcos dictatorship
was toppled in 1986.
The human
rights group showed statistics to back up this assertion: From January to
November 2006 alone, there were 185 extra-judicial killings and 93 forced
disappearances. Of the 185 extra-judicial killings, 53 took place in
Central Luzon, 30 in the Bicol Region and 20 in Southern Tagalog. Of the
93 forced disappearances, 50 occurred in Central Luzon, 20 in Southern
Tagalog and four each in the Bicol Region, Eastern Visayas, and SOCSARGEN.
These
statistics, however, are but part of a larger picture that has been taking
shape since 2001. The data from Karapatan further show that from January
2001 – when President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was catapulted to power
through a popular uprising – to Dec. 12, the number of extra-judicial
killings has risen to 801 and 208 cases of forced disappearances. At least
345 of the victims were affiliated with cause-oriented groups.
The number of
extra-judicial killings recorded in the less than six years of the Arroyo
administration is already dangerously close to the 1,500 that were
documented by church-based human rights groups in the 14 years of the
Marcos dictatorship (1972-1986). As regards the forced disappearances, the
number of those documented under the Arroyo administration has surpassed
the combined records of the Ramos and Estrada administrations.
Most
prominent
From its own
monitoring and coverage of these killings and disappearances since 2001,
Bulatlat has gathered that the most prominent among the victims
were active advocates of social change, “new politics” organizers, peace
and justice crusaders, and critics of the Arroyo government who had called
for the President’s ouster. Many of the celebrated victims of
extra-judicial killings and forced disappearances – previous to their
deaths or disappearances – also received messages, mostly from anonymous
senders, warning them to stop their political activities or face dire
consequences. In fact, many of them were reportedly in the military’s
Order of Battle (OB) or hit list.
Such is the
political involvement of the most prominent victims that the term
“extra-judicial killings” has been frequently used interchangeably with
“political killings.”
Many of the
victims are peasants, workers, and indigenous people but there were also
party-list organizers, priests and pastors, human rights defenders,
lawyers, journalists, teachers, and students.
Battling
the “insurgency”
The very
statements of the Arroyo administration’s most trusted national security
and military point men appear to show that these killings and
disappearances are taking place within the government’s
counter-“insurgency” campaign.
In a press
briefing covered by Bulatlat last August 21 in Quezon City,
National Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales categorically said that legal
progressive groups – alleged “front organizations” of the underground Left
- are among the targets of the counter-“insurgency” drive.
“There are
two frames of their (the communists’) struggle: armed and legal,” Gonzales
said. “Those in the legal frame say they should not be included among
those pursued by General Palparan because they are in the legal arena.
Let’s get into the moral plane: you are the ones advocating armed
struggle, you are the ones strengthening armed struggle, you are the ones
who give resources to strengthen armed struggle – and you say you should
not be included.”
“That’s what
Satur Ocampo and the others say,” Gonzales continued. “What do you mean
you should not be included? You are the ones recruiting for the NPA (New
People’s Army), you are the ones giving money to the NPA, you are the ones
making the rebellion grow – and you say you are innocent?”
The General
Palparan Gonzales was referring to is retired Maj. Gen. Jovito Palparan
Jr., who has earned notoriety as “butcher” for the countless shocking
cases of human rights violations in the areas under his command during the
period, from Mindoro Oriental where he served as colonel then as brigadier
general, to Eastern Visayas, where he commanded the 8th ID, and
Central Luzon, 7th ID.
Street marchers
In a chance
interview with Bulatlat also last August in Sulu Hotel in Quezon
City, Palparan referred to legal activists, “those who march in the
streets” as he described them, as “supporters” of the clandestine and
communist-led NPA.
“Supporters
are also targets but not necessarily to kill them,” Palparan said. “We
organize information drives in communities, convince them to deny support.
If we can’t convince them it’s up to them. They are keeping something,
maybe dangerous, they have gone deep.”
Yet in his
stint as commander of the Army’s 8th Infantry Division in
Eastern Visayas last year, Palparan threatened to “stop anti-government
rallies in Samar island within six months.” In a radio program, “Express
It at the Park,” cited in a Bulatlat report, he told listeners,
“They (cause-oriented groups) should be removed completely from here at
the fastest means available, in the shortest possible time… They should be
targeted first, the leaders, because they are the initiators.” Referring
to peasants who were reported missing, he said “Pasensya na kayo sa
paisa-isang kinukuha at ninunyutralisa natin sa mga baryo...yung
masasamang tao na nawawala, mabuti naman na mawala sila. These are bad
eggs. Gumagawa sila ng kagaguhan (Please excuse us if we have to take
and neutralize those in the barrios one by one. It is good for the bad
elements to disappear. These are the bad eggs. They promote chaos).”
Outrage
The killings
and disappearances have generated outrage even from local quarters
previously silent on issues of national significance, as well as the
international community. Such is the outrage spawned by these killings and
disappearances – for which the blame has been laid on as far as
Malacañang’s doorstep, inasmuch as these mainly targeted vocal critics of
the Arroyo administration – that the President had been forced to form
probe bodies to look into these, and to issue a categorical statement
“condemning” political killings.
The
Philippine mainstream media, most notably the major dailies, began
publishing frequent editorials and special reports on the killings and
disappearances in mid-2006, in contrast to their previous silence on this
issue. Statements of concern about human rights violations were issued by
groups like the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), the
Philippine Political Science Association (PPSA), and the UP University
Council – as well as mainstream opposition politicians like Rep. Francis
Escudero and Sen. Aquilino Pimentel Jr., and even a few administration
politicians like Sen. Joker Arroyo, as well as the Commission on Human
Rights (CHR), a quasi-governmental body.
On May 12,
2006, the Arroyo administration formed Task Force Usig, a Philippine
National Police (PNP) body led by Police Deputy Director General Avelino
Razon to probe into the killings of activists and journalists. The task
force was given 10 weeks within which to yield results from its probe. To
date it has yet to come up with a full report, more than two months after
its deadline.
“In the
harshest possible terms I condemn political killings,” Arroyo said in her
2006 State of the Nation Address (SoNA) before Congress last July 24,
2006. “We together stopped judicial executions with the abolition of the
death penalty. We urge witnesses to come forward. Together we will stop
extra-judicial executions.”
This
statement, however, failed to reassure quarters that had raised their
voices to condemn human rights violations under the Arroyo administration.
For immediately before uttering these lines, she heaped praises on
Palparan.
“And we will
end the long oppression of barangays (villages) by rebel terrorists who
kill without qualms, even their own,” she said. “Sa mga lalawigang
sakop ng 7th Division, nakikibaka sa kalaban si Jovito Palparan
(In those regions under the supervision of the 7th [Infantry] Division,
Jovito Palparan is battling the enemy).” “Hindi siya aatras hanggang
makawala sa gabi ng kilabot ang mga pamayanan at makaahon sa
bukang-liwayway ng hustisya at kalayaan (He will not back down until
the communities emerge from the night and rise towards the dawn of justice
and freedom).”
By the term
“rebel terrorists,” Arroyo was apparently referring to the Communist Party
of the Philippines-New People’s Army (CPP-NPA), which is on the U.S.
Department of State’s list of “foreign terrorist organizations” or FTOs.
Similarly, the “killings” she was referring to are apparently those
allegedly carried out by the CPP-NPA.
Matter of policy
In an
interview with Bulatlat, a retired Army officer, who withheld his identity
for security reasons, confirmed that the killings and other rights
violations are the military’s handiwork. “It’s a matter of policy,” he
said..
Since the families of the victims insist
that members of the military are the culprits, “the obvious conclusion is
that it is not a result of a purging within the NPA,” he added, “because
the victims’ families should know the sentiments of their kin.”
The fact that the president praised
Palparan in the 2006 SONA would only mean “she agrees with what Palparan
is known for,” the source said.
“Purge”
The Armed
Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the PNP have attributed the killings
to an alleged “purge” within the ranks of the “communist movement,” of
which they tagged many of the victims as leaders. This was shown in
Bulatlat interviews with provincial and regional police officers, as
well as investigation reports obtained from local police units, for its
two-part series on political violence and forced disappearances titled
“Who are Behind the Violence and Disappearances?” and “A Reign of Silence
by GMA,” published in mid-2005. This was the same line pursued by Task
Force Usig early on.
Arroyo’s
statement referring to “rebel terrorists who kill without qualms, even
their own” fits neatly within the AFP and PNP line on the killings, and
glosses over the analysis that lawyer Remigio Saladero, Jr. put forward in
Bulatlat’s interview with him for the two-part investigative series
published in 2005. In the interview, Saladero observed that from
historical experience, the NPA has not killed anyone without admitting the
act.
“Why so?”
Saladero said, “because they consider that a political victory on their
part. They would explain why the person was killed or ‘punished.’ But in
these cases there is no admission by the NPA.”
In the cases
of extra-judicial killings reported by various human rights and people’s
organizations under the Arroyo regime, including those in Central Luzon
which is under the jurisdiction of the 7th Infantry Division,
there has been no admission by the NPA of having any hand in the acts.
In its report
released Aug. 15, 2006,
Philippines: Political Killings, Human Rights and the Peace Process,
the Nobel Peace Prize-winning group Amnesty International (AI) lambasted
the Arroyo administration for failing to undertake credible investigations
into the extra-judicial killings. Referring to investigations conducted by
Task Force Usig, AI expressed its concern “at persistent reports that the
majority of investigations do not meet international standards as set
forth in the UN Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation
of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions, as supplemented by UN
Manual Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary
and Summary Executions” and that the investigations “have reportedly not
led to the conviction of any of the perpetrators of the hundreds of
killings of leftist activists since 2001.”
In the cases
of 15 lawyers and 10 judges killed since 2001, AI said none of the
perpetrators have been convicted. Then, out of the 114 party-list members
killed since 2001 recorded by the task force, 27 cases had been filed in
court and the remaining 86 are still under investigation. However, “Out of
the 27 cases filed in court, the PNP has arrested suspects in only three
cases. No convictions have been reported.”
The failure
to conduct believable probes into these cases and punish the perpetrators
had been denounced in 2005 by an International Solidarity Mission (ISM),
jointly conducted by several foreign church groups and non-government
organizations, which culminated in the International People’s Tribunal (IPT)
in November 2005 in Quezon City. The IPT found Arroyo accountable for
human rights violations.
The human
rights violations were also condemned by the Citizens’ Congress for Truth
and Accountability (CCTA), which recommended among others that Arroyo
vacate Malacañang.
Melo
Commission
On Aug. 21,
2006, President Arroyo formed the Melo Commission also to investigate the
killings of activists and journalists. The Commission – headed by retired
Supreme Court Justice Jose A. R. Melo who is reported to be close to the
Macapagal-Arroyos – has relied mainly on reports from Task Force Usig and
testimonies from military officials. Without having been able to interview
survivors of and witnesses to the more celebrated cases of human rights
violations, it has cleared the military – including Palparan – in several
areas.
Understandably, the formation of Task Force Usig and the Melo Commission,
and Arroyo’s statements supposedly condemning the “political killings,”
have failed to douse cold water on the anger spawned by the killings and
disappearances. Statements condemning human rights violations and
pressuring Arroyo to act on these have continually poured in from various
international quarters – among them the Council of the European Union; the
governments of Finland, Spain, France, Canada and, most recently, Japan;
the World Council of Churches (WCC); the World Alliance of Reformed
Churches (WARC); the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC); the Uniting
Church in Australia; the United Church of Christ in Canada; the United
Methodist Church in the U.S.; and the Washington-based Human Rights Watch
(HRW).
In an unprecedented move,
the Joint Foreign Chambers of Commerce, comprising big business groups
from the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Europe, Japan and
Korea, and the Philippine Association of Multinational Companies Regional
Headquarters, called on the Arroyo government to put a stop to the
killings or risk losing foreign investments.
A similar plea was made in a
letter sent to Mrs. Arroyo later that was signed by officials of Wal-Mart
and U.S.-based apparel companies Gap, Polo Ralph Lauren, Liz Claiborne,
American Eagle Outfitters, Jones Apparel Group and Phillips Van Heusen.
In the
Philippines, the frustrations of victims and their relatives over official
investigation and judicial processes have driven them to turn to available
international machineries, like the UNHRC and the PPT.
In an
interview with Bulatlat, lawyer Romeo Capulong, who will be the
lead prosecutor in Mrs. Arroyo’s trial before the PPT in March 2007, said
he does not believe that justice will be served within the country’s legal
framework.
“Our national
forum, especially under Arroyo, is very inadequate,” the former UN Judge
as Litem, said. “We have no more way, no more forum to establish these
human rights violations comprehensively, completely and fully here with
competent, sufficient, credible evidence. That is why we have resorted to
the PPT. Many of the Jury Members there are Nobel Peace Laureates and
persons internationally known in their respective fields, so you can’t
question their integrity.” Bulatlat
Cries for Justice, Prayers of Hope
(Conclusion)
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.