Analysis
New Media, Propaganda Make Review Board
Irrelevant
While the new media
necessitates the rethinking of the current practice of review and
classification in television and film, what proves to be more important
at this point is to expose how the current administration resorts to
de facto censorship of contrary views through agencies like the
MTRCB.
By DANILO
ARAÑA ARAO
Bulatlat
Review and
classification have become somewhat irrelevant in the age of new media
and this puts into question the continued existence of the Movie and
Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB). To make things
worse, the MTRCB is now being used as an instrument to deter
counter-propaganda even as its mandate prevents it from reviewing
government-produced materials for public exhibition.
As a result of the
“X” rating on the documentary “Ang Mabuhay para sa Masa” (To
Live for the Masses) on the life of former President Joseph Estrada,
the latter’s supporters decided to just make it available on the
Internet. There are also reports that pirated copies of the documentary
are now being sold.
At present, the
MTRCB has no control over audio and video files that can be retrieved
from the Internet. This, however, is no reason to take comfort as other
government agencies like the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC)
could use the controversy surrounding the Estrada documentary as an
excuse to facilitate the blocking of certain websites which is being
done in other countries like China.
In any case,
observers are right to note that all the MTRCB did was to increase
public curiosity on the documentary and that it even unwittingly helped
in the documentary’s promotion even to those who are not supporters of
the ousted President.
The MTRCB’s August
28 memorandum stated that based on the second and final review of the
Estrada documentary, the latter tended to “threaten the political
stability of the state; undermine the faith and confidence of the
people in the government; [be] libelous or defamatory; [pertained] to
matters that are sub judice in nature.” It upheld the decision
of the first review committee which gave an X rating to the documentary
on August 23.
One can argue that
the documentary is just part of the Estrada supporters’ propaganda
campaign against the government, and that proof of this is their
decision to forego earnings from public exhibition by making the
documentary freely available, at least for those who have Internet
access.
Be that as it may,
it cannot be denied that the Macapagal-Arroyo administration is also
involved in its own propaganda campaign to gain the people’s
confidence. In fact, Malacañang produced not just one but two
documentaries in justifying the imposition of the state of national
emergency (Paglaban sa Kataksilan: 1017 in March) and the
conspiracy to bring down the current administration (Sabwatan sa
Kataksilan in April).
Unlike the Estrada
documentary, the MTRCB did not subject these two documentaries to
review and classification. After all, Section 9 of the MTRCB’s
Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) states: “No films, television
program, or publicity/promotional material for such films and TV
programs, unless they are imprinted or exhibited by the Philippine
Government and/or its departments and agencies, shall be granted
exemption from review and classification for audience suitability.”
(italics mine) It may be recalled that no less than the administration
called on television stations to air these documentaries. The second,
Sabwatan sa Kataksilan, was even previewed in Malacañang.
In 2004, the MTRCB
approved the public exhibition of the documentary titled Imelda
on the life and times of former First Lady Imelda Romualdez-Marcos.
Unlike the Estrada documentary, this did not question the legitimacy of
the Macapagal-Arroyo administration and even ended up putting the
Marcoses in a bad light.
The MTRCB’s
provision exempting government-produced materials from review and
classification apparently operates on the assumption that government
officials exercise better judgment over the private sector, especially
the opposition, when it comes to suitability for audience viewing.
More importantly,
this also exposes the one-sided nature of review and classification at
the MTRCB. Then again, the situation comes as no surprise as the MTRCB
is under the Office of the President.
There is indeed a
trend right now for the MTRCB to be used in preventing the spread of
what the powers-that-be deem as counter-propaganda. In fact, the
National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) even issued an
alert on August 23 that the MTRCB demanded from the producers of a new
public affairs show of ABC 5 the deletion of some portions of its first
episode featuring the New People’s Army (NPA).
While the new
media necessitates the rethinking of the current practice of review and
classification in television and film, what proves to be more important
at this point is to expose how the current administration resorts to
de facto censorship of contrary views through agencies like the
MTRCB. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.