Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts

Vol. V,    No. 13      May 8- 14, 2005      Quezon City, Philippines

HOME

ARCHIVE

CONTACT

RESOURCES

ABOUT BULATLAT

www.bulatlat.com

www.bulatlat.net

www.bulatlat.org

 

Google


Web Bulatlat

READER FEEDBACK

(We encourage readers to dialogue with us. Email us your letters complaints, corrections, clarifications, etc.)
 

Join Bulatlat's mailing list

 

DEMOCRATIC SPACE

(Email us your letters statements, press releases,  manifestos, etc.)

 

 

For turning the screws on hot issues, Bulatlat has been awarded the Golden Tornillo Award.

Iskandalo Cafe

 

Copyright 2004 Bulatlat
bulatlat@gmail.com

   

Bills of Suppression

Baguio journalists commemorated World Press Freedom by discussing several bills pending in Congress that threaten press freedom.

By Carole Jean Cupag and Kristine Marie Torres
Northern Dispatch

Posted by Bulatlat

BAGUIO CITY – In commemoration of the World Press Freedom Day on May 3, the Baguio-Benguet chapter of the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) held a media forum on the state of press freedom at the old chapel of Camp John Hay last May 4.

Speakers included Prof. Gary Mariano of De La Salle University, chair of the Philippine Press Council (PPC); lawyer Randy Kinaud, secretary-general of the Cordillera Human Rights Alliance (CHRA); and Art Allad-iw, NUJP national vice chair.

The forum focused on the Senate Bills (SB) 1120, 1828 and the House of Representatives’ Anti-terrorism bill. Mariano explained that these bills are possible threats to press freedom. The SB 1120 or the Right to Reply Act by Sen. Aquilino Pimentel, says that the public or the readers should also have the right to comment or give reactions to the news published in newspapers.

On the other hand, SB 1828 or the Magna Carta for Journalists by Sen. Jinggoy Estrada gives the journalists benefits such as 13th month pay, bonuses, hazard pay, insurance, overtime pay and protection. The senate bill also requires accreditation and licensing of journalists. It also calls for the formation of a press council that would create a code of ethics, from which sanctions for malpractice of journalists could be acquired.

According to Mariano, instead of giving journalists more freedom in reporting, the bills are an infringement to press freedom. SB 1120 removes the editors and publishers prerogative to screen the letters to the editor. While in SB 1828, the creation of a set standard for journalists gives only a single category for all. He also cited that the person or the group that would set the standard for journalists is also questionable for the skills of the journalists could not be standardized.

Mariano added that journalism, as a profession is truly debatable, for the nature of the work of journalists is to report events and express opinions, unlike in other profession where they have to ensure the service they give to the public.

Lawyer Kinaud discussed the Anti-terrorism bill where terrorism is defined as an act that is threatening or intimidating. Kinaud also explained the sanctions that could be given to suspected terrorists, such as detention for 30 days without filing a formal case and a freeze order to the bank accounts from the court. He also shared that the Anti-terrorism bill also allows the formation of an anti-terrorist council that will have the power to classify organizations as terrorists. To the groups or persons that were proven as terrorists, they will be charged a fine of P10 million.

Kinaud explained that the provisions in the Anti-terrorism bill could be used for abuse. He set as an example the provision on the immunity from prosecution of the people who would stand as witnesses in terrorism cases. People in authority he said, could easily abuse their power and use this provision to turn into witnesses and be free from liabilities. He also added that the anti-terrorism bill would also limit the reports that journalists could do, for interviews with the communists such as New People’s Army (NPA) could be considered as a terrorist act, and reporters could be easily charged with conspiracy.

Allad-iw presented NUJP’s position paper to the anti-terrorism bill.

He also cited that of the 67 cases of journalists’ death, only one was resolved. Meanwhidle, a powerpoint presentation titled, “Knowing the Enemy,” created by the Intelligence services of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (ISAFP) tagged the NUJP and Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) as the “enemies of the state.” Allad-iw said both the killings and government tagging of media as enemies threaten journalists as well as the people’s basic rights, including the right to life and information.

Before the forum ended, the NUJP launched the petition signing against the Anti-terrorism bill.  Northern Dispatch /Bulatlat

BACK TO TOP ■  PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION  ■   COMMENT

 

© 2004 Bulatlat  Alipato Publications

Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.