Tuition Hikes
Disastrous to College Assurance Firms
Filipino parents’ dreams of ensuring their children’s
college education through pre-need plans continue to be shattered with the
closure of the country’s first ever college assurance company.
By Carl Marc Ramota
Bulatlat
The deregulation of college tuition through the enactment of the Education
Act in 1982 opened the doors for a sharp rise in tuition, making higher
education more elusive if not impossible to many students for the last two
decades.
Pacific Plans check |
In turn, this has prompted many parents to avail of educational plans to
secure their children's college education. In the beginning, the budding
pre-need education industry seemed to provide the remedy. To date, the
P150-billion industry is growing at a phenomenal double-digit rate with
some four million plan beneficiaries. |
To many parents however the recent unexpected downfall of the first
pre-need firm in the
country - Pacific Plans Incorporated (PPI) - following the same fate of
industry leader College Assurance Plan (CAP) paint a grim picture.
Worse, more pre-need firms are expected to follow PPI’s fate. As early as
2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) admitted that more than
90,000 pre-need plan holders were left high and dry when 13 pre-need firms
were either suspended or gone bankrupt.
In the end, the plan holders are the biggest losers. With the successive
collapse of pre-need firms, the dreams of thousands of parents and their
children for a college education are left in a shambles.
Rehabilitation?
Last April 23, some 2,000 PPI plan holders converged at Saint Paul's
College’s Pasig gym to protest a recent court ruling allowing PPI's
petition for rehabilitation.
Earlier on April 14, Makati Regional Trial Court Judge Romeo Barza issued
a stay in order allowing PPI "to stop paying its obligations until the
company is rehabilitated." In its petition for rehabilitation, the 38-year
old company is given five years or until 2010
to put its fiscal house in order.
In a statement, the Yuchengco-owned company blamed the incessant tuition
hikes for its financial woes. "The deregulation of tuition,” a company
statement said, “has caused a tremendous rise in the cost of education,
which in turn put
an enormous pressure on traditional (open-ended) plans and their
respective trust funds considering that pre-need companies dealing in such
securities could not pass on the additional cost to their planholders."
PPI also blamed the
devaluation of the peso which has "resulted in a poor business climate,
compromising a pre-need company's ability to meet its obligations."
Pacific Plans' trust fund is estimated at $50 million, consisting mostly
of the liquid assets in the U.S. dollar-denominated National Power Corp. (Napocor)
bonds maturing in 2010.
”Surprised” SEC
Apparently, even the SEC was caught off guard with PPI's move. SEC
Chairman Fe Barin admitted that the Commission was "caught by surprise,"
as there was no sign of a liquidity problem with Pacific Plans based on
the financial statement submitted to the
commission.
Before the PPI folded up, SEC even approved in August 2004 the company’s
application for a "corporate restructuring" which effectively transformed
it into a “special purpose vehicle” left holding all the problematic
pre-need investments.
Curiously, the safe pre-need products, those offering fixed benefits, were
transferred to a new company, Lifetime Plans. After securing the
divestment, PPI's board of directors led by its chairperson and president,
Helen Y. Dee, resigned en masse.
The Yuchengcos
brought along with them about 400,000 pre-need plans into Lifetime Plans,
leaving Pacific Plans with 34,000 open-ended, traditional education plans.
In the open-ended education plans the company is obliged to pay tuition at
any rate, unlike fixed-value plans.
Angry plan holders
To appease angry plan holders, PPI offered an interest of seven percent on
educational plans for those who can wait until 2010. The interest offer is
lower compared to prime time deposit accounts offered in some banks which
give 8.5 percent earnings.
PPI said it can still pay the tuition of plan holders but only as "tuition
support," the amount of which will still be determined by the school type.
In a statement, PPI spokesperson Jeanette Tecson said "the company will
pay most of the educational claims for non-exclusive or less expensive
schools but will only shoulder less than half the claims of those enrolled
in schools with high tuition." In this payment scheme, Pacific Plans will
provide only P28,000 for semestral plan holders, P29,000 for annual plan
holders and P22,000 for trimester plan holders.
But the tuition support is not enough, angry plan holders reacted, adding
they "felt deprived and cheated of their money." In the recent April 23
PPI plan holders meeting, a plan holder commented that the company pledges
were all part of “a greater scheme to legitimize their position to file a
petition for rehabilitation."
Another plan holder
said the PPI brouhaha can be considered as a "grand-scale estafa." They
also blamed the SEC for being "toothless" in protecting the welfare of
pre-need consumers.
Among those who flocked to St. Paul
was Elizabeth Centeno on behalf of her sister Anabelle Macalinao, who is
working in Dubai. Macalinao, a widow, availed of an educational plan for
her 13-year old son John Paul before she left for Dubai four years ago.
Centeno said she was surprised when she first heard the news and quickly
called her sister abroad.
"Nagulat din yung sister ko. Shocked siya. Iniisip niya safe na yung
edukasyon ng anak niya nung kumuha siya ng plan” (She was also
surprised. She was shocked. She assumed her son's education was already
assured when she availed of a plan.), Centeno said quoting her sister.
Centeno admitted she and her sister fear for John Paul's college education
now that it is uncertain whether they can still refund their payment from
Pacific Plans. "Hindi rin natin masasabi na laging may
pera para sa pag-aaral ng bata" (We really can't tell if we will
always have the money for the child's education), she told Bulatlat.
Distressing signal
In a statement, Anak ng Bayan Youth Party Vice President Raymond Palatino
blamed the Education Act of 1982 for the current pre-need industry crisis.
"Pacific Plans and CAP's downfall merely highlight how the cost of
education, particularly in the tertiary level, has
dramatically increased after the deregulation of tuition," he said.
He predicted that more pre-need firms are doomed to close this coming
school year unless the government starts to arrest the incessant tuition
hikes in tertiary schools.
In a recent study, Anak ng Bayan (nation’s youth) projects that if the
average tuition
rate increase of 12 percent continues over the next five years, the
national average per unit would reach P590.20 by 2010. By then tuition
would have increased by as high as 1,257.41 percent since 1990.
Palatino said the closure of pre-need firms sends a distressing signal to
college hopefuls. "Parents and students apply for pre-need plans to ensure
that they may be able to shoulder the high cost of tertiary education,” he
said. “With pre-need firms now closing, access to higher education has
become more elusive to many."
He also predicted an upsurge in the rate of college dropouts and number of
out-of-school youth in the coming school year. Bulatlat
BACK TO
TOP ■
PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION ■
COMMENT
© 2004 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided
its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.