After
7 years of privatization
Water Remains Unaffordable, Inaccessible
Water
has become more commodified as a result of privatization. While consumers
are burdened with water rate hikes, indigenous peoples are deprived of
water as mining firms take control of their water resources. The First
National Convention on Water held Aug. 10 to 11 criticized the corporate
offensive on water resources.
By
RONALYN V. OLEA
Bulatlat
Since
the privatization of the Manila Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) in
1997, water rates in Metro Manila have increased by as much as 400
percent.
As
if this is not enough, Renato Reyes Jr., spokesperson of Bagong Alyansang
Makabayan (BAYAN or New Patriotic Alliance) last week added that private
firms Maynilad and Manila Water Services which took over the MWSS failed
to meet the expected coverage of their services. In Maynilad’s case,
only 57 percent of its clients have 24-hour water service.
Reyes
made the revelation during the First National Convention on Water held
Aug. 10-11 in UP Diliman, Quezon City.
Like
the two water concessionaires in Metro Manila, water rates in other
regions also increased. There
was a 125 percent hike in Leyte in Eastern Visayas. Meanwhile, Bacolod
City in Negros Occidental implemented a 15 percent to 34 percent increase every year.
The
water rate in Baguio City in northern Philippines has also increased by 50
percent since 2000.
Privatization
In
the same convention, Ferdinand Gaite, chairperson of Confederation for the
Unity, Advancement and Recognition of Government Employees (Courage)
stressed that the government deliberately left MWSS to deteriorate further
to justify its privatization.
“Priority
should be to provide the much-needed resources to ensure the delivery of
basic services,” Gaite said. “MWSS contributes P1 billion ($17.96
million, based on an exchange rate of P55.68 per US dollar) to the coffers
of the government but this was never used to improve services.”
Reyes
said, “Ang pinakamalaking sampal sa mukha ng pribatisasyon ay ang
nangyari sa Maynilad kung saan hindi na ito nakapagbayad ng mga concession
fees sa gobyerno at ipinasa na ang utang ng Maynilad sa taongbayan.” (The
biggest slap on the face of privatization is what happened to Maynilad
where it failed to pay concession fees to the government and it passed on
its debt to the people.)
Reyes
also opposed the bailout of Maynilad which the latter proposed to the
government. He said that the ballooning budget deficit must be enough
reason for the government to reject the bailout.
Despite
the MWSS experience, privatization of water services and water resources
in other cities and provinces are underway. In a national consultation on
water organized by BAYAN last June, water districts in Baguio City, Cebu,
Davao, Tacloban, Iloilo and Bacolod were reportedly being privatized.
Reyes
noted the entry of business tycoons Lopez, Ayala and Aboitiz in many
privatization projects.
Antonio
Tujan Jr., research director of Ibon Foundation, said that while
privatization has been reversed in other countries, the Macapagal-Arroyo
administration refuses to take over and operate Maynilad even as the
latter asked it to do so. “But this could also be a charade (of Arroyo
and Maynilad),” he said.
President
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s Executive Order 279 virtually calls for the
eventual privatization of water districts. There are about 200 water
districts nationwide.
Threat
to the survival
Meanwhile,
Joan Carling, chair of the Cordillera People’s Alliance (CPA) expressed
the indigenous peoples’ outrage over the private destruction of the
river system.
Carling
cited the cases of Benguet Corporation and Lepanto Corporation in Benguet
province, northern Philippines. Both mining corporations were granted
water permits, with their areas covering rivers, springs and creeks used
by indigenous peoples for their domestic and agricultural needs.
“Water
is being made a commodity for profit of big corporations,” Carling said.
“The
issuance of these permits is an issue of denial for the indigenous people.
It is a direct threat to our continuing survival,” said the CPA
chair.
Carling
also cited the San Roque Dam Project in eastern Pangasinan, which started
operation last year. Hundreds of farmers lost their land and livelihood.
She said at least 350 families have not been compensated for the
land.
The
CPA asserted the government must stop issuing water permits.
Foreign
aid
Reyes
noted the intervention of foreign lending institutions to the
privatization of the said water districts.
Based
on the reports from regions, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has
$1-billion interest in Laiban Dam and P30-million ($538,793.10) loan for a
barangay water system in Samar, in central Philippines.
The
Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), meanwhile, infused P537
million ($9.64 million) for the Bacolod Water District.
The Australian Aid (AusAid) handles the Baguio Water District
rehabilitation project which costs P797 million ($14.31).
Abundant
Reyes
said that access to water is a question of who controls the country’s
water resources.
He
said that a 1997 government study cited that while the country has
abundant water resources, 63 percent of the population does not have
access to potable water and 47 percent of the agricultural lands lack
irrigation.
GMA’s
promise
In
her inaugural speech and state of the nation address (SONA), President
Macapagal-Arroyo vowed to provide water to all barangays. However, Tujan
said that Arroyo’s program is anti-poor and premised on privatization.
“With
the government’s distrust to local government units, corporations and
foreign funding come in. Water would (therefore) still be expensive,”
Tujan said.
Government
control
Emmie
de Jesus, secretary general of Gabriela, said that water should be
provided by the state. She said that privatization proves to be senseless.
De
Jesus said the government should take control of the water industry.
She clarified, however, that the kind of government to do so must
be “upright.” Bulatlat
Back
to top
We
want to know what you think of this article.
|