Relief
NGOs Oppose DND-led Disaster Management Council
Say P370M
disaster funds unaccounted for
Disaster
relief NGOs in the Philippines try to fill the void that remain unaddressed by
government calamity agencies and sometimes, according to the United Nations
itself, more effectively. Thus when a House bill seeks to place them directly
under a new disaster management council headed by the defense secretary, they
cry foul. They also want the defense department to explain why some P370 million
of disaster funds remain unaccounted for.
By
Alexander Martin Remollino
Bulatlat.com
Non-government
organizations (NGOs) involved in disaster response and
prominent personalities in the academe, united under the umbrella of Task
Force: Community-Based Disaster Management
(TF: CBDM), are opposing a bill filed by Bukidnon Rep. Juan Miguel Zubiri
(Lakas Christian/Muslim Democrats) ostensibly seeking to strengthen the
Philippine disaster response program.
Aside
from the fact that the NGOs under TF:CBDM loath being under the National
Disaster Management Council (NDMC), they believe that the current disaster
coordinating council headed by the defense secretary should explain to the
public why certain funds totalling Php370 million allocated in recent years
remain unaccounted for, based on a report by the Commission on Audit (CoA).
TF:
CBDM is composed of the following: Citizen’s Disaster Response Center (CDRC),
Philippine Disaster Management Forum (PDMF), Center for Disaster Preparedness,
Council for Health and Development, Samahang Operasyong Sagip, BACES (a
community service organization based in San Beda College), and teachers from the
University of the Philippines, Miriam College, St. Joseph College, and the Jose
Abad Santos Memorial School.
HB
221, “An Act Streamlining and Strengthening the Philippine Disaster
Preparedness and Prevention Capability, Appropriate Fund Therefor and for Other
Purposes,” was filed in 2001. It intends to create a National Disaster
Management Council (NDMC) which will supervise disaster response operations.
At
present, the task of coordinating the government’s disaster response work
falls on the National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC), an attached agency
of the Department of National Defense (DND). The DND’s Office of Civil Defense
(OCD) functions as its secretariat.
Salient
features, opposition
The
bill provides that the NDMC shall have the secretary of national defense as
chairman and the interior and local government secretary as vice chairman, with
the following as members: the secretaries of social welfare and development,
health, agriculture, public works and highways, environment and natural
resources, labor and employment, education, tourism and industry, economic
development authority, and science and technology; together with the armed
forces chief of staff, the director-general of the Philippine National Red
Cross, and two representatives from the NGOs.
Section
2, Paragraph (e) of HB 221 provides: “It shall be the policy of the state to
enhance the involvement of the non-government organizations in the government
disaster preparedness and prevention program to strengthen delivery mechanism of
emergency services and ‘bayanihan’ among the citizenry.”
This
is one of the provisions with which TF: CBDM has taken issue. CDRC deputy
executive director Rosalinda Tablang, who is also the spokesperson of TF: CBDM,
said in a position paper: “The sub-section...seems to consider NGOs as
adjunct machineries for the implementation of government programs. NGOs and
government organizations are inherently distinct and independent entities. The
creation and proliferation of NGOs was born precisely out of the many
inadequacies of government services and programs for the people.”
Section
23, Paragraph (k) of the bill provides that “solicitation of funds and/or
donations by accredited NGOs shall be regulated and monitored by NDMC through
its member agencies concerned to ensure that public donations are safeguarded
and duly accounted for.”
To
this, Tablang replies: “Does the bill guarantee a corruption-free and
externally driven disaster response system where disaster victims really get the
relief assistance intended for them and government officials refrain from using
donated goods or medicines for their partisan politics?”
Unaccounted
amounts, wrong computations
The
reports of the Commission on Audit (CoA) on the OCD for the years 1999, 2000 and
2002 appear to justify TF: CBDM’s concerns about possible corruption in the
present set-up of the Philippine disaster response system. These reports reveal
massive amounts unaccounted for by the OCD. (The COA website contains no report
on the OCD for 2001. Bulatlat.com tried to obtain a copy of this from the COA
office in Quezon City, but was informed that it could be downloaded from the
commission’s website.)
Based
on the 2000 report, the OCD received that year a total of Php30,000,000 in
calamity funds under two Special Allotment Release Orders.
Of
these, Php7,000,000 were unaccounted for. The report states: “Utilization of
calamity funds in 1999 and 2000 totaling Php7,000,000 could not be monitored as
these were given to NDCC as cash advances contrary to the stipulation stated in
the Special Allotment Release Order (SARO).” Php2,000,000 of these were given
in 1999 and the rest were given in 2000.
There
is no explanation of why the COA was able to audit the SARO calamity fund
allotments for 1999 only under the 2000 report, not under the 1999 report as
should be expected.
Amounts
unaccounted for in 2000 add up to Php347,862,000.
Of
these, Php342,352,000 are made up of donations in cash and in kind to the
NDCC’s Tulong Kapatid program, which are supposed to be used for relief
operations. Combining the CoA reports on the OCD for 1999, 2000 and 2002, the
unaccounted donations to the Tukong Kapatid Program makes up the biggest amount
unaccounted for by the OCD for a single year.
For
2002, Php20,695,229.34 in funds is unaccounted for.
Putting
together the figures unaccounted for by the OCD for 1999, 2000 and 2002, one
gets a total of Php370,557,229.34. The NDCC, an attached agency of the DND under
whose wing the Zubiri bill intends to place disaster response NGOs, has a total
of Php370,557,229.34 in unaccounted funds for 1999, 2000 and 2002.
Aside
from concerns on corruption, there are worries about whether the DND is
efficient enough to lead Philippine disaster management and response NGOs. The
CoA reports on the OCD for 1999, 2000 and 2002 all point to several instances of
misclassification of accounts, non-booking of transactions, late deposits or
submissions of reports, non-transferring of balances that needed to be
transferred, neglect of equipment, and erroneous computations.
Bulatlat.com
attempted to contact the OCD and get its side, but was told by OCD staff
that no one was available to comment on the issue.
Campaign
TF:CDBM
has been conducting lobby work with congressmen for HB 6376, a counter-measure
to HB 221, filed last September by Bayan Muna Reps. Satur Ocampo, Crispin
Beltran, and Liza Maza. HB 6376, “An Act
Strengthening Philippine Disaster Management and Creating the National Disaster
Management Commission, Providing Funds Therefor and for Other Purposes,” aims
to create a separate government agency to focus solely on disaster response, to
be led by representatives of disaster response NGOs.
As
of last Nov. 15, three congressmen have said they will co-sponsor HB 6376: Raul
del Mar, Harlin Abayon, and Amin Hussin. Three others—Carlos Padilla, Benigno
Aquino III, and Reynaldo Uy—have said that the bill is good, but that they
still have yet to decide whether to co-sponsor it.
TF:
CBDM has also been circulating a petition calling for a comprehensive and
pro-people disaster management bill. The petition seeks a disaster management
program that:
1.
Addresses the roots of people’s vulnerability to disasters and integrates
disaster management programs with the country’s social development proram.
2.
Relies on building people’s capacities toward attaining disaster-resiliency
through the community-based disaster management approcach.
3.
Defines comprehensive and concrete disaster management programs and services
that focus not only during the relief and emergency phase but also more
importantly on the pre- and post-calamity phases of a disaster.
4.
Gives special and undivided attention to disaster management by removing the
NDCC from the Department of National Defense-Office of Civil Defense and
creating a separate and special government body, agency or commission under the
Office of the President for the task.
As
of this writing, TF: CBDM has been preparing for a forum to be held at the House
of Representatives on Nov. 18. Bulatlat.com
Back
to top
We
want to know what you think of this article.
|