Bu-lat-lat (boo-lat-lat) verb: to search, probe, investigate, inquire; to unearth facts Volume 3, Number 40 November 9 - 15, 2003 Quezon City, Philippines |
Impeachment Reeks of GMA-Cojuangco Collusion - SMC UnionThere are signs of collusion between President Macapagal-Arroyo and SMC Chair Eduardo Cojuangco in the impeachment case filed against Supreme Court Chief Justice Hilario Davide, Jr. This came from the president of the SMC employees union who also warns no impartial trial will be conducted given that the impeachment initiators represent the business empire of Cojuangco. By
Alexander Martin Remollino William
Merene, president of the Kilusang Mayo Uno-affiliated San Miguel Corporation
(SMC) Employees Union, said over the weekend that there are signs of collusion
between President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and SMC chairman Eduardo “Danding”
Cojuangco in the impeachment case filed against Supreme Court (SC) Chief Justice
Hilario Davide, Jr. Davide
faces impeachment in the Senate after more than 90 members of the House of
Representatives signed a complaint initiated more than a week ago by Reps.
Gilberto Teodoro and William Fuentebella of Cojuangco’s Nationalist People’s
Coalition (NPC). The embattled Chief Justice talks to the press The
impeachment complaint accuses the SC chief justice of failing to allocate 80
percent of the Judiciary Development Fund (JDF) to the cost-of-living allowance
of court employees. “How
can there be an impartial trial on the charges against the chief justice when
the lead initiators of the case are identified with Danding?” Merene told
Bulatlat.com. “They are pushing a clear agenda behind the impeachment bid,
that is, to replace Davide with a more loyal associate in the judiciary who will
cater to all of Danding’s and Gloria’s interests.” Anakpawis
chair for electoral concerns Crispin Beltran, who recently resigned from the
House, made a similar analysis in a recent statement. “It’s
evident that Cojuangco is the one calling the shots in this issue,” Beltran
said. “His stands, opinions and objectives are what guide the proponents of
the Davide impeachment efforts. Cojuangco is neither an elected official nor a
presidential appointee, but he wields the power of scores of congressmen. The
influence he has over Congress and even the presidency of Arroyo should be
denounced. His machinations to remove Supreme Court chief justice Hilario Davide,
Jr. and conspiracy with President Arroyo to retain his control over the disputed
P130-billion coco levy should be investigated and criminal sanctions laid down
against him.” Teodoro,
a nephew of Cojuangco and leader of the NPC in the House, is the principal
initiator of the impeachment complaint against the chief justice. P700
million According
to Teodoro and Fuentebella, more than P700 million of the JDF had been spent on
the construction of vacation houses for SC justices in Baguio City, the purchase
of luxury vehicles, and the renovation of the SC and the Court Appeals. Under
Presidential Decree No. 1949, which established the JDF during the martial law
years, 80 percent of the funds should be allocated for the cost-of-living
allowances of court employees and only the remaining 20 percent may be spent on
office equipment. Said
Merene: “Danding and his cohorts are merely using this very legitimate issue
to advance his economic interests.”
Both
Merene and Beltran have called for the junking of the impeachment complaint
against the chief justice. “The impeachment complaint should be junked even
before session resumes on November 10,” Beltran said. “The complaint is
fuelled by Cojuangco’s thirst for revenge, and malicious intent to keep the
coco levy funds. It’s clear that the impeachment supporters in the House are
not so much goaded by concern for the welfare of court employees and the missing
judiciary development funds as they are by Cojuangco.” Meanwhile
Danilo Ramos, secretary-general of the Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas, called
on the SC not to be intimidated and to uphold its ruling on the coco levy fund.
“The justices should not allow the highest tribunal to be used as protector of
Cojuangco’s economic empire and Ms. Macapagal’s electoral machinery,” he
said. Ramos
also said that greed was behind the impeachment complaint. “Greed is the root
of all these evils,” he said. “Cojuangco’s greed for the P130-billion
coconut levy fund vis-a-vis Ms-Macapagal’s greed for power beyond 2004.” Trail of “conspiracy”The
alleged conspiracy between Macapagal-Arroyo and Cojuangco began on Sept. 27,
2001, when then Malacañang publicist Dante Ang reportedly helped forge a
“compromise settlement” of the coco levy funds. The
coco levy is a series of taxes exacted from the earnings of coconut farmers from
1971 to 1983 or during the Marcos dictatorship. (Cojuangco was then a crony of
Marcos.) The levy was supposed to aid the coconut farmers. However, coconut
farmers have not received any form of help in exchange for the coco levy and the
funds were used to acquire shares in major corporations, including SMC of which
Cojuangco has been chairman for several years. Cojuangco
himself admitted in Civil Case 33, which is pending before the Sandiganbayan
(anti-graft court), that he acquired his shares of stock in SMC when he was
still chief executive officer of the United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB) and
CIIF Oil Mills, a company formed by Marcos in the 1970s to control the coconut
industry. Cojuangco
also admitted to the Sandiganbayan that he secured some P2 billion in
“loans” from the UCPB and “cash advances” from the CIIF and used these
to buy 20 percent of shares from Enrique Zobel de Ayala in 1983. Signed
by Cojuangco, Zamboanga City Mayor Maria Clara Lobregat, and more than 20
supposed organizations of coconut farmers, the deal sought to place at least P50
billion from the coco levy fund into a “perpetual trust fund,” the interest
earnings of which were supposed to go to the farmers and the coconut industry.
Now President Macapagal-Arroyo stood to gain a commission of P20 billion pesos
from the deal, claimed Linda Montayre of the People’s Consultative Assembly (PCA),
one of the groups that participated in the People Power 2 uprising. In
a statement last week, Merene corroborated Montayre’s claim. “Gloria,
through First Gentleman Mike Arroyo, already collected a P20 billion commission
on the compromise deal on the coco levy case,” he said. “She is obliged to
help Danding as she needs political and financial support for her presidential
bid in 2004. Danding, on the other hand, gained even more under Mrs. Arroyo’s
administration.” Merene
also said: “Another proof of the conspiracy is the fact that although the
impeachment complaint was initiated by the NPC, there are members of Lakas who
signed it. They could not have done that without Gloria’s knowledge.” Lakas-CMD
signatories Out
of more than 80 signatories to the impeachment complaint, ten are members of the
administration Lakas-Christian/Muslim Democrats: Jose Carlos Lacson, Soraya
Jaafar, Wilhelmino Sy-Alvarado, Faustino Dy III, Jacinto Paras, Herminio Teves,
Amado Espino, Jr., Perpetuo Ylagan, Juan Miguel Zubiri, and Rodolfo Albano.
On
Dec. 14, 2001, the SC ruled that the coco levy funds were prima facie public
funds. Two days later, Macapagal-Arroyo allowed Cojuangco to stay on as SMC
chairman—a violation of the SC decision. This
was followed by the Kirin-SMC deal of January 2002, in which the Macapagal-Arroyo
administration allowed the sale of 15 percent of SMC shares for $540 million.
Under the agreement, Kirin and Cojuangco would vote as a single bloc. Last
Sept. 17, the Sandiganbayan reversed a 1986 PCGG sequestration order on
Cojuangco’s shares in SMC. According to the Sandiganbayan, the writs violated
a rule that sequestration orders must be signed by two PCGG commissioners. Last
October, Sen. Joker Arroyo—chair of the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee—said it
was strange that it took the Sandiganbayan 17 years to find the PCGG
sequestration order defective in form. “Mr. Cojuangco is chairman emeritus of the NPC, an opposition party that coalesced with Lakas and... Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr. in the House. They want the Constitution amended through a (constituent) assembly. President Arroyo wants that, too—a confluence of interests,” Senator Arroyo said in a media interview last Oct. 10. The latest chapter in this trail of alleged conspiracy is the impeachment case against Chief Justice Davide, Merene said. “Cojuangco is not sure of Davide,” he said. “So all obstacles must be removed.” In terms of seniority, Justice Reynato Puno is next to Davide. According to SMCEU vice-president Amado Vidal, Puno has a son who is an assistant vice-president in SMC. Davide still not off the hookAll these, however, do not mean that Davide must no longer be held culpable for the JDF scam, Merene said. “This is a very legitimate issue being raised by the court employees, and Davide must be investigated for this.” Merene
proposes an investigation of the JDF scandal by a body with no connection to the
government whatsoever. “When the government forms investigating bodies, it can
easily influence the outcome of investigations,” he said. “What is needed is
an investigation by a group whose members are to be nominated by the basic
masses.” “Reject elite democracy”Meanwhile,
Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan) secretary-general Teodoro Casiño criticized
the pro-impeachment congressmen, the SC itself and “civil society” groups
sweepingly exculpating Davide, for hypocrisy. According
to Casiño, pro-impeachment congressmen are using the grievances of court
employees “to project themselves as champions of the working class and enemies
of corruption, while at the same time pursuing Cojuangco’s devious ploy of
harassing and weakening the SC into submission.” He
added: “On the other hand, as abhorrent as a Congress catering to the selfish
agenda of Cojuangco and Macapagal-Arroyo is a Supreme Court using its powers to
protect one of its own, and civil society groups equating Davide’s impeachment
as an attack on democracy. “Where
are these defenders of democracy when the rights of farmers are being violated
by big landowners? Or the rights of workers are being violated by capitalists?
Where are they when human rights are being trampled with impunity by the police
and military?
“It
is only now, when one of their own is under attack, that they cry for justice
and democracy. But they turn a blind eye when the masses are victimized by the
undemocratic and unjust machinations of the ruling elite.
“Thus, we condemn the hypocrisy of both sides and call on the people to reject elite democracy.” Bulatlat.com We want to know what you think of this article.
|
|