October 23, 2014     Philippines
Support alternative journalism. Donate to Bulatlat.com.

December 17, 2012
Public school teachers protest cut in bonus

By ANNE MARXZE D. UMIL
Bulatlat.com

MANILA – December is a season of giving, but not for government employees.
Public school teachers marched to Chino Roces Bridger (former Mendiola Bridge), December 14 to in protest of the 50-percent reduction of their Productivity Enhancement Incentive (PEI).

“It’s as if it’s not Christmas,” said Digna Balderama, 45, a single mother to three children. The Department of Budget and Management recently announced public school teachers would receive P5,000 ($121) as PEI, instead of the usual rate of P10,000 ($243).

Balderama, a grade one teacher at the San Francisco Elementary School in Quezon City, lamented: “Our salary is not even increasing and then the government will reduce our benefits.”

Carrying their black lantern with slogans “PEI P10,000, not P5,000. Junk Aquino’s PBB [Performance- based Bonus],” Baldemara and other teachers from different public schools in Quezon City, Manila and other parts of the country joined the nationally-coordinated black lantern protest march.

The PEI was reduced because of the new Executive Order 80 or the Performance Based Bonus which was issued by President Benigno Aquino III last July. The deducted amount will be added to the funds that for the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB).

Public school teachers march against ‘a gloomy Christmas.’(Photo by Anne Marxze D. Umil / bulatlat.com)

Under EO 80, a PEI will be given to all government employees but not all government employees are entitled to the PBB. Budget Secretary Florencio Abad said that the PBB system is a merit-based scheme and employees “who underperform or fail to meet their targets won’t actually receive anything.”

Benjamin Valbuena, chairman of the Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT) said that the reduction of their PEI has angered teachers. For the past ten years, teachers had been receiving the PEI of P10,000. Valbuena said the reduction of the PEI will greatly affects teachers as many of them are buried in debt.

France Castro, secretary general of ACT and second nominee of ACT Teachers Party, meanwhile, argued that the funds for PBB should not be deducted from their PEI since there is an allocated budget for the said bonuses for December 2013. “There is an allocation of P9 billion ($370 million) in the 2013 General Appropriations Act for the PBB. So why deduct half of our PEI for PBB? It is just so vague,” Castro said pointing out that PBB is yet to be implemented in 2013.

Under the EO 80, government employees who belong to a government agency that will be ranked as “best” in performance will receive bonus. The PBB will range from P5,000 to P35,000 ($875).

According to the EO, when a government office will be ranked as the “best bureau,” P35,000 will be given to the best performer, P20,00 for better performer, and P10,000 for good performer.

Black Santa? Public school teachers think President Benigno Aquino III is after his administration cut their bonus in half.(Photo by Anne Marxze D. Umil / bulatlat.com)

A government office ranked as “better bureau,” the best performer can receive P25,000; better performer, P13,500; and good performer, P7,000. While in a “good bureau,” the best performer will be rewarded P15,000; better performer, P10,000; and good performer, P5,000. Government offices and their employees who will be ranked as below satisfactory will not be entitled to the PBB.

“For the Department of Education (DepEd) to be ranked as best agency is like a punch in the moon,” said Maximo Obaldo, also a teacher from San Francisco Elementary School.

“Our performance will be based on the performance of our students. All the blame is on us when the students are not doing well in school; Especially now that Quezon City got low scores in National Achievement Tests, all the more that we are not going to be ranked as best,” Obaldo lamented.

PBB deceiving

Abad said the PBB hopes to “encourage better work performance in the bureaucracy.”

But ACT begged to disagree, saying the PBB is deceptive and divisive. “Instead of encouraging cooperation and unity among co-employees, this will trigger competition and eventually divisiveness. It will also breed ‘palakasan’ and ‘sipsipan’ system.”

“The evaluation of our performance rests on the hands of our superiors and there is a great possibility that their judgment of our work may be arbitrary or subjective. This will then affect the amount of ‘bonus’ which we will receive. There will no more be across-the-board salary increase. Even the salary standardization law will be removed,” Valbuena pointed out.

Also among the criteria for an agency to have PBB is when it meets the target under the five Key Result Areas and the Philippine Development Plan, 2011-2016.

“The PBB shall be given to personnel of bureaus or delivery units in accordance with their contribution to the accomplishment of their Department’s overall targets and commitments subject to the criteria and conditions,” the EO read.

Castro lambasted the said criteria. She said that the said scheme further intensifies corporatization being implemented by Aquino administration.
In a position paper, ACT and All-UP Workers Alliance said that teachers, non-teaching personnel, health workers and other government employees are giving public service and not income.

The groups said that among the “targets” that the government agency should meet is the internally generated income that will push for government agencies like schools, state universities and colleges, and public hospitals to increase fees to their services. “This is part of the corporatization implemented by the Aquino regime dictated by neoliberal globalization,” the position paper read.

“Given all these aspects, ACT calls on all teaching and non-teaching personnel to join us in our continuous fight for higher salaries and wages. Let us ask that PBB be junked. Let us expose and oppose the privatization and corporatization of government agencies and services which are dictates of the neoliberal policy of globalization,” Valbuena said. (http://bulatlat.com)

ARTICLE TOOLS
Printer-Friendly Version Printer-Friendly Version

TAGS
, ,
CATEGORIES
* Latest PostsnameOther Stories
REPRINT
Feel free to reprint, repost or republish this material. (Read Bulatlat's syndication policy.)

5 thoughts on “Public school teachers protest cut in bonus

  1. Pingback: National Achievement Test, Performance-Based Bonus system, not the solutions to improve education system « Bulatlat

  2. I agree whole-heartedly..the bad always taints the good..everytime!
    I am wondering very deeply and seriously about how the Dept.Ed. will reward the teachers nationwide for;

    1.The introduction of K-12 education this year,and in the future

    2.The extra knowledge and skills teachers will need to enable them to pass on successfully to our children the wholesome but religiousness-free information re the RH Bill and it’s policies regarding the school children.
    Surely that is a “specialist” area where experts are needed..that the teaching of that information should NOT be put onto the day-to-day teachers already struggling now to keep up to the ever-growing curriculum that society expects of them.
    The teaching of,and care of our children..by the PARENTS and the TEACHERS,is THE number one priority for this growing country(100,000,000 now?)
    Improve the payments to teachers,thus improving the quality of the teaching..a happy teacher is 100% caring for their pupils

  3. Not all those working in the DepEd are corrupt there are those working on far flung mountains walking for hours just to teach childrens, and all they expect this christmas is a 10,000 bonus. PBB process is not uet reliable and fool proof, the poor teacher’s other half of P5,000 can go to bosses pets and favorites.. sad christmas.

  4. The creeping cancer that is corporatization of public utilities like schools,universities,hospitals,electricity and water production basically enforcing those facilities to operate solely to make a profit,and where the users of such facilities invariably are worse off than before the conversions.Most profits then seem to fall into the laps of the CEO’s and board-members,with the balance going to shareholders,many of whom are not living in the Pilipinas.
    Teachers have a difficult job to do,often in very primitive and simple facilities without decent resources,class-rooms and furniture.To pull money out of their pockets demonstrates a very clouded thinking within the Dept.of Education indeed.
    No problems though,finding money for defence.
    Seems as though the people who run the Pilipinas’catholic churches are one-in-the-same as those running the State’s schools..those people wish to keep Pilipinos poor and ignorant!

BROWSE BY SECTION OR SUBJECT ››

Politics
Economy
Human Rights
OFWs & Migration
Agrarian Reform
Labor & Employment
Urban Poor
Environment
Education
Youth
Indigenous Peoples

Women & Children
Health
Media
Culture
Poetry
Analysis & Opinion
Regions
International
Democratic Space
Press Releases
Downloads

ON THE FRINGES (BULATLAT STAFF BLOG) ››