Comments on: Misunderestimating the Philippine Left

By: jim

jim — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:35:30 +0000

NAT DEM, SOC DEM & even POP DEM..please be reminded that we are all aiming for SOCIALISM.. it just so happened that we have different views with regards to our SOCIAL SITUATION; thus creating different means of struggle; hardcore radicals prefer not to engaged in elections, other radicals joined the mainstream politicians in the field, moderate lefts are known for parliamentary struggle..
i dont think there is a point to stir.. we are all in one direction.. IT is so important that we are united as BROAD LEFT while we are in the stage of NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC REV..AFTER NDR..then matira ang tunay at purong tagapagtanggol ng IDEOLOHIYANG KALIWA

By: jim

jim — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:28:29 +0000

i admire your arguments re:MAZA & OCAMPO alliance with MAnny villar;there is nothing bad about such a tactical alliance; BUT,isnt so strange that THE BASIC PRINCIPLE of a leftist is to protect the oppress & we are all out declaring our war against the enemy of the People; LANDGRABBERS, TYRANTS, CORRUPTS & HYPOCRITES RULING ELITES; bu what about VILLAR’s landgrabbing of THE ANCESTRAL lands of the AETAS in bulacan..ALL of these are not allegations..there are ongoing cases against him for that.. the AETAS has all the neccessary documents to get what is due to them.. check it over the REGISTER OF DEEDS if villar papers are legal and binding..

in anyway my point is the basic thing that a LEFT whether a moderate or radical must know its principles & will never go against it at all cost

By: Misunderestimating the Philippine Left : The Philippine Reporter

Misunderestimating the Philippine Left : The Philippine Reporter — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:41:33 +0000

[...] conferences, they hate Joma Sison, and they endorse the candidacies of Noynoy Aquino and Mar Roxas. (Read story…) Filed Under News, [...]

By: portia

portia — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:49:46 +0000

Does this mean that the “left” now endorses Villar? What about his alleged scandals? I’d be voting for Legarda, Maza, and Ocampo; meanwhile, I am almost tempted not to vote anyone for president

By: Leo

Leo — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:29:07 +0000

Ka Raymund's essay is very precise and correct. Hontiveros "good left"posturing confuses the people of what the left fights for. Ginagamit niya ang pulang bandila, lengguwaheng makakaliwa, maka-masang pagpapakilos pero sa ubod ng kanyang paninindigan ay isa siyang oportunistang burges na naglalaway na sila naman ang umupo sa kapangyarihan.

By: kabi

kabi — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:14:56 +0000

dapat palaganapin ang artikulong ito.
ang pag-atake sa “bad left” ay isang pagkampi (hayag o di hayag)sa bulok na sistemang ginigiba ng “bad left.”

By: migo

migo — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:34:24 +0000

maganda at malinaw ang pagkakalatag ng argumento at komento ni mong…

malaon nang alam na ang bumubuo ng partido Liberal ay mga anti-komunista na walang magawa kundi manira, dagdag pa ang grupo ni Liza Hontiveros na nagpoposturang kaliwa subalit labnaw naman ang paninindigan at pampalito lang ang inilalakong mga programa.

samantala, sa lahat ng mga kakandidato sa pagka-pangulo ay si villar lang ang nagbigay puwang sa mga binansagang "bad left" at sumasang-ayon sa mga programang bitbit nito…..

By: idward

idward — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:49:54 +0000

agree. proud that im on the side of “bad” philippine left.

By: flip

flip — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:09:37 +0000

maganda ang essay na ito ni mong…

By: flip

flip — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:08:44 +0000

ok si jamby pero hindi tactical…